Why Free 2025 School Placement Checking is Wrong and Unhelpful

When the Ministry of Education and the Ghana Education Service announced that the 2025 SHS placement checking would be free of charge, it was celebrated by many parents and BECE graduates.

On the surface, this looks like a relief: no one has to buy scratch cards or placement checker pins anymore.

However, the unintended consequences of this “free” policy are now exposing the weaknesses of Ghana’s placement system and causing more harm than good.

Why Free 2025 School Placement Checking is Wrong and Unhelpful

1. Free Checking Destroys Small Businesses

For years, small-scale entrepreneurs, internet café operators, and vendors earned an honest income selling placement checkers and assisting parents to access the CSSPS portal. This ecosystem not only created jobs but also distributed the demand for placement checking more evenly across the country.

Now, with everything being free, that entire network has collapsed. Small businesses have been cut out of the process, leaving thousands of young entrepreneurs jobless overnight. A policy that should have been a blessing has, in reality, eroded livelihoods.

2. The Free System Overburdens the Portal

Because checking placements is now free, anyone with an index number can log in, sometimes repeatedly, just for curiosity or mischief. Previously, scratch cards made students and parents cautious — one careless attempt could mean buying another pin.

Today, there’s no barrier. Former students, siblings, or even strangers who know an index number can check placements endlessly. This has led to avoidable and artificial traffic spikes that are crashing the CSSPS portal.

When everyone is checking “for fun,” the students who actually need their placements are locked out.

3. Technical Weaknesses Exposed

The current portal setup makes matters worse:

• Date of birth is now optional. This means anyone with just an index number can access student details. That raises both security and privacy concerns.

• Read moreHarvard announces free tuition for students from families making $200,000 or less

  The system wasn’t stress-tested. By offering free, unlimited checks, the ministry has engineered a situation where the servers are collapsing under traffic — a predictable outcome.

• No clear explanations. Instead of transparent updates, parents are left with vague “under maintenance” messages.
• This leads to serious personal data security breaches because an old student of a school can use his or her index number and add 25 to it to check a result and that of many. This in itself adds more traffic to the site and creates problems.

4. Why Paid Services Are Better

Let’s be frank: free government services in Ghana rarely work well. Whether it is electricity subsidies, free WiFi, or free placement checking, the same pattern repeats—poor investment, lack of maintenance, and eventual collapse.

When placement checking required a small fee, it created three important safeguards:

1. Reduced traffic. Only serious candidates were checked, keeping the system stable.

2. Value chain support. Café operators, vendors, and resellers played a key role in distributing demand.

   

3. Accountability. A paid service encourages better infrastructure investment because users expect reliability when money is involved.

5. What Parents and Students Should Do Now

Until the government rethinks this policy, parents and students need strategies to cope with the chaos:

• Be patient with the portal. Expect delays and downtime. Try checking at off-peak hours (late night or early morning).

• Don’t share index numbers widely. This prevents unnecessary repeated checks that clog the system.

• Seek help from official GES offices. District and regional offices can confirm placements when the portal fails.

• Print and save immediately. Once you successfully access the portal, save and print your placement before the system crashes again.

A Call for Smarter Policy

Making placement checking free may sound politically attractive, but it undermines efficiency, fairness, and sustainability. A better approach would be:

• Low but reasonable fees (for example, GHC 5 per-check).

  

• Security measures like mandatory date of birth verification.

• Investments in server capacity and regional distribution of services.

By striking a balance between affordability and functionality, Ghana can have a placement system that is both accessible and reliable.

READ: MoE, GES and the Mahama government failed BECE graduates — CSSPS collapsed on release

The 2025 placement fiasco is not just about servers failing — it is about policy failure. Free placement checking, while well-intentioned, is wrong and unhelpful. It burdens the system, wipes out small businesses, and erodes accountability. Parents and students deserve more than empty promises; they deserve a placement system that works.