Why must the state pay for people’s post-graduate choices? – Randy Abbey on Scholarship Secretariat saga

Dr. Randy Abbey, a prominent media figure and host of Metro TV’s “Good Morning Ghana,” has sparked discussion by questioning the rationale behind the Scholarship Secretariat paying for individuals’ choices to pursue advanced degrees, especially abroad.
During a segment of his show, Dr. Abbey argued that personal advancement through education should primarily be an individual’s financial responsibility, not the state’s.
“If you want to do an MBA or MA in a foreign institution, that’s your choice. Why must the state pay for it?” he remarked, highlighting that the benefits of such education accrue mainly to the individuals who receive them, hence they should bear the costs.
This stance comes amid reports from the Fourth Estate, revealing that many scholarships have been awarded under dubious circumstances, seemingly favoring those with connections to the ruling New Patriotic Party.
Such revelations have led to accusations of cronyism and mismanagement of public funds intended to support education.
Echoing Dr. Abbey’s concerns, Member of Parliament for South Dayi, Nelson Dafeamekpor, voiced the Minority caucus’s intentions to demand a thorough investigation into the Scholarship Secretariat’s practices once parliamentary sessions resume.
ALSO READ: Ghanaian students On Government Scholarship in Serbia cry over delayed stipends
The aim is to ascertain the fairness and transparency of the scholarship awards, which are believed to be tainted by favoritism and conflict of interest.
“The Minority has raised the bar now, and they are asking for the interdiction of the registrar and an inquiry into the matter,” Dafeamekpor explained.
The discourse is not merely about the allocation of scholarships but also touches on broader issues of governance, transparency, and public accountability.
The implication is that the use of public funds for private gain, especially when those funds are meant to facilitate educational opportunities for the underprivileged, undermines the trust in public institutions and depletes resources meant to uplift the broader society.
Dr. Abbey’s critique invites a reconsideration of how scholarship funds are allocated and who benefits from them.
It raises fundamental questions about the role of the state in supporting education and whether public resources should subsidize personal advancements that may not directly contribute to public welfare.
The ongoing debate highlights the need for stringent criteria and transparency in the awarding of educational grants, ensuring that they serve the public good rather than private interests.
Share Our Post on the Topic ‘Why must the state pay for people’s post-graduate choices? – Randy Abbey on Scholarship Secretariat saga’.
To Read More Stories, Click Here.