2022 Top 20 Best Global Universities in Africa (Check Ghanaian University)
The 2022 Top 20 Best Global Universities in Africa league table is out and only one university from Ghana made it to the top list. Strangely it is not the University of Ghana The universities captured on the league table are added by merit by looking at their research performance and their ratings by members of the academic community around the world in the region. South African Universities dominated the world rankings with the University of Capetown, South Africa topping the league table with a Global score of 70%
READ: Fully Funded PhD Research in Youth Justice in Ireland plus €74,000 stipend
2022 Top 20 Best Global Universities in Africa
The universities that make it to the list are ranked based on their global scores and their position on the overall Best Global Universities rankings. These are the top global universities in Africa.
1. University of Capetown, South Africa
Global score:70.0
Enrollment:21,757
2. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Global score:63.2
Enrollment:26,873
3. Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Global Score:58.7
Enrollment:24,733
4. University of Kwazulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
Global Score:56.5
Enrollment:34,755
5. Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
Global Score:55.8
Enrollment:212,585
6. University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Global score:55.1
Enrollment:28,273
7. University of Ibadan, Ibadan,Nigeria
Global Score:54.9
Enrollment:N/A
8. University of Pretoria,Hatfield (South Africa)
Global Score:54.8
Enrollment:36,337
9. Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Global score:53.1
Enrollment:N/A
10. Northwest University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Global Score:51.7
Enrollment:N/A
READ: Fully Funded Scholarship PhD in early modern history worth €93,912
11. AddisAbaba University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Global Score:51.5
Enrollment:N/A
12. Kwame Nkrumah University Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Global Score:49.9
Enrollment, 74,441
13. Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Global Score:49.0
Enrollment:151,666
14. Mohammed First University of Ouja, Ouja, Morocco
Global Score:48.7
Enrollment:N/A
15. Makerere University, Kampala,Uganda
Global Score:46.6
Enrollment:N/A
16. University of the Western Cape, Belville, South Africa
Global Score:46.1
Enrollment:N/A
17. Alexandria University, Alexandria,Egypt
Global Score:46.8
Enrollment:N/A
18. University of Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco
Global Score:44.9
Enrollment:N/A
19. University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
Global Score:44.9
Enrollment:N/A
20. University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
Global Score:44.4
Enrollment:N/A
How U.S. News Calculated the Best Global Universities Rankings
The eighth annual U.S. News & World Report Best Global Universities rankings were produced to provide insight into how universities compare globally. Since an increasing number of students plan to enroll in universities outside of their own country, the Best Global Universities rankings – which focus specifically on schools’ academic research and reputation overall and not on their separate undergraduate or graduate programs – can help those applicants accurately compare institutions around the world.
The Best Global Universities rankings also provide insight into how U.S. universities – which U.S. News has been ranking separately for nearly 40 years – stand globally. All universities can benchmark themselves against schools in their own country and region, become more visible on the world stage, and find top schools in other countries to consider collaborating with.
The overall Best Global Universities ranking encompasses 1,750 top institutions, up from nearly 1,500 last year, and spread across more than 90 countries, up from 86 last year. The first step in producing these rankings, which are powered by Clarivate™ involved creating a pool of 1,849 universities that was used to rank the top 1,750 schools.
To create the pool of 1,849, U.S. News first included the top 250 universities in the results of Clarivate’s global reputation survey, described further below. Next, U.S. News added in any other institutions that had met the minimum threshold of at least 1,250 papers published in 2015 to 2019. This paper threshold is unchanged from last year. Those two criteria created the final 2022 ranking pool of 1,849 institutions from which the top-scoring 1,750 universities are ranked by U.S. News in the overall ranking.
As a result of these criteria, many stand-alone graduate schools, including Rockefeller University in New York and the University of California—San Francisco, were eligible to be ranked and were included in the ranking universe.
The second step was to calculate the rankings using the 13 indicators and weights that U.S. News chose to measure global research performance. Each of the school’s profile pages on usnews.com lists the overall global score as well as numerical ranks for the 13 indicators, allowing students to compare each school’s standing in each indicator.
The indicators and their weights in the ranking formula are listed in the table below, with related indicators grouped together; an explanation of each follows.
RANKING INDICATOR | WEIGHT | |
---|---|---|
Global research reputation | 12.5% | |
Regional research reputation | 12.5% | |
Publications | 10% | |
Books | 2.5% | |
Conferences | 2.5% | |
Normalized citation impact | 10% | |
Total citations | 7.5% | |
Number of publications that are among the 10% most cited | 12.5% | |
Percentage of total publications that are among the 10% most cited | 10% | |
International collaboration – relative to country | 5% | |
International collaboration | 5% | |
Number of highly cited papers that are among the top 1% most cited in their respective field | 5% | |
Percentage of total publications that are among the top 1% most highly cited papers | 5% |
Reputation Indicators
Results from Clarivate’s Academic Reputation Survey aggregated for the most recent five years, from 2017 to 2021, were used to create the two reputation indicators used in U.S. News’ ranking analysis.
The survey, which aimed to create a comprehensive snapshot of academics’ opinions about world universities, asked respondents to give their views of programs in the disciplines with which they were familiar. This method allowed respondents to rate universities at the field and department level, rather than at the institution level, creating a more specific and accurate measurement of a university’s reputation as a whole.
To appropriately represent all regions, Clarivate took steps to overcome language bias, differing response rates and the geographic distribution of researchers. These steps included:
- Sending an invitation-only survey to academics selected from Clarivate’s databases of published research, based on the estimated geographic proportions of academics and researchers around the world.
- Providing accessibility in seven languages.
- Rebalancing the survey’s final results based on the geographic distribution of researchers to overcome differing response rates.
- Excluding respondents’ nominations of their own institution or alma mater.
Respondents also self-declared their job role:
- 66% academic staff.
- 14% research staff.
- 7% senior institutional leaders.
- 5% graduate/postgraduate students.
- 4% other jobs and roles.
- 3% not currently working at a higher education institution.
- 2% teaching staff.
- 2% other positions.
- 1% management and administrative.
The total number of respondents was 26,660 broken down by year:
- 2017: 4,000.
- 2018: 4,960.
- 2019: 6,300.
- 2020: 7,700.
- 2021: 3,700.
The survey results were used in two separate ranking indicators, as follows.
Global research reputation (12.5%): This indicator reflects the aggregation of the most recent five years of results of the Academic Reputation Survey for the best universities globally for research.
Regional research reputation (12.5%): This indicator reflects the aggregation of the most recent five years of results of the Academic Reputation Survey for the best universities for research in the region; regions were determined based on the United Nations definition.
This regional indicator significantly increased the international diversity of the rankings, since it focused on measuring academics’ opinions of other universities within their region. The U.S. News rankings are the only global rankings to use this indicator, and the 2022 edition marks the eighth year of its inclusion.
Bibliometric Indicators
The bibliometric indicators used in U.S. News’ ranking analysis are based on data from Clarivate’s Web of Science™ for the five-year period from 2015 to 2019. The Web of Science is a web-based research platform that covers more than 21,100 of the most influential and authoritative scholarly journals worldwide in the sciences, social sciences, and arts and humanities.
Publications (10%): This is a measure of the overall research productivity of a university, based on the total number of scholarly papers – reviews, articles and notes – that contain affiliations to a university and are published in high-quality, impactful journals. This indicator is closely linked to the university’s size. It is also influenced by the university’s discipline focus, since some disciplines, particularly medicine, publish more than others.
Books (2.5%): Books are an important medium of publication for scholarly research, particularly in the social sciences and arts and humanities. The ranking indicator provides a useful supplement to the data on articles and better represents universities that have a focus on social sciences and arts and humanities.
Conferences (2.5%): Academic conferences are an important venue for scholarly communication, particularly in disciplines tied to engineering and computer science. The formal publication of conference proceedings can represent genuine research breakthroughs in certain fields that may not have been documented or published elsewhere.
Normalized citation impact (10%): The total number of citations per paper represents the overall impact of the research of the university and is independent of the university’s size or age; the value is normalized to overcome differences in research area, the paper’s publication year and publication type.
NCI is considered one of the core measures of research performance and is used by various research evaluation bodies globally. The subject fields used in the analysis came from Clarivate, which helps institutions evaluate research output, performance and trends; understand the scope of an organization’s scholarly contributions; and articulate outcomes to inform research priorities. Clarivate uses the content and citation indicators found in the Web of Science.
Total citations (7.5%): This indicator measures how influential the university has been on the global research community. It is determined by multiplying the publications ranking factor by the normalized citation impact factor. Total citations have been normalized to overcome differences in research area, publication year of the paper and publication type.
Number of publications that are among the 10% most cited (12.5%): This indicator reflects the number of papers that have been assigned as being in the top 10% of the most highly cited papers in the world for their respective fields. Each paper is given a percentile score that represents where it falls, in terms of citation rank, compared with similar papers – those with the same publication year, subject and document type.
Since the number of highly cited papers is dependent on the university’s size, the indicator can be considered a robust indication of how much excellent research the university produces.
Percentage of total publications that are among the 10% most cited (10%): This indicator is the percentage of a university’s total papers that are among the top 10% of the most highly cited papers in the world – per field and publication year. It is a measure of the amount of excellent research the university produces and is independent of the university’s size.
International collaboration – relative to country (5%): This indicator is the proportion of the institution’s total papers that contain international co-authors divided by the proportion of internationally co-authored papers for the country that the university is in. It shows how international the research papers are compared with the country in which the institution is based. International collaborative papers are considered an indicator of quality, since only the best research attracts international collaborators.
International collaboration (5%): This indicator is the proportion of the institution’s total papers that contain international co-authors and is another measure of quality.
Scientific Excellence Indicators
Number of highly cited papers that are among the top 1% most cited in their respective field (5%): This highly cited papers indicator shows the volume of papers classified as highly cited in the Clarivate’s Essential Science Indicators™ service. Highly cited papers in ESI are the top 1% in each of the 22 broad fields represented in the Web of Science, per year. They are based on the most recent 10 years of publications.
Highly cited papers are considered indicators of scientific excellence and top performance and can benchmark research performance against subject field baselines worldwide. This is a size-dependent measure.
Percentage of total publications that are among the top 1% most highly cited papers (5%): This percent of highly cited papers shows the number of highly cited papers for a university divided by the total number of documents it produces, represented as a percentage. It is a measure of excellence and shows the percentage of an institution’s output that is among the most impactful papers in the world. This is a size-independent measure.
How the Overall Global Scores and Numerical Rankings Were Calculated
To arrive at a school’s rank, the overall global scores were calculated using a combination of the weights and z-scores for each of the 13 indicators used in the rankings. In statistics, a z-score is a standardized score that indicates how many standard deviations a data point is from the mean of that variable. This transformation of the data is essential when combining diverse information into a single ranking because it allows for fair comparisons between the different types of data.
Some of the indicators were highly skewed, so the logarithmic transformation of the original values was used. These indicators were:
- Publications.
- Books.
- Conferences.
- Total citations.
- Number of publications that are among the 10% most cited.
- Global research reputation.
- Regional research reputation.
- Number of highly cited papers that are among the top 1% most cited in their respective field.
- International collaboration.
- International collaboration – relative to country.
The logarithmic transformation rescaled the data and allowed for a more normalized and uniform spread across indicators. After these 10 indicators were normalized, the z-scores for each indicator were calculated to standardize the different types of data to a common scale.
To reach a school’s overall global score, the calculated z-scores for each of the 13 indicators were then weighted using the assigned weights described earlier. U.S. News determined the weights based on our judgment of the relative importance of the ranking factors and in consultation with bibliometric experts.
The overall global score for each school was calculated by summing the school’s weighted values for each indicator. The minimum score from the pool of 1,849 institutions was then subtracted from each of the scores to make zero the lowest possible score.
The scores were then rescaled by multiplying the ratio between the overall performance of each university and the highest-performing university by 100. This forced the scores to fall on a zero to 100 scale, with the highest-performing school earning an overall global score of 100.
The 1,750 top universities out of the 1,849 ranked were then ranked in descending order from 1 to 1,750 based on their weighted, rescaled overall global score. Each school’s overall global score was rounded to one decimal place to increase variance between scores and to minimize the occurrence of ties.
In addition, the 1,849 universities received a numerical rank for all 13 ranking indicators – such as publications, total citations and global research reputation – based on their z-score for that indicator. The highest-scoring university for each of the 13 indicators received a rank of 1, and the lowest-scoring university – except for regional research reputation – received a rank of 1,849. Ties were allowed.
The regional research reputation numerical ranking is calculated based on the schools within each of the six U.N. regions. Those six regions are Africa, Asia, Australia/New Zealand, Europe, Latin America and North America. This means the regional reputation numerical ranking has six No. 1 schools – one for each region in the overall ranking. This ranking lets users compare schools and determine which have the strongest research reputation in their geographic region.
As noted earlier, the numerical ranks for each of the 13 indicators are published on usnews.com. Some schools in the top 1,750 universities ranking fall in the 1,751 to 1,849 range of certain ranking indicators. The numerical ranks published for each ranking indicator are to be used to determine the relative position of each school in that indicator. The numerical indicator ranks were not used to calculate the overall global score.
Data Collection and Missing Data
The data and metrics used in the ranking were provided by Clarivate. The bibliometric data was based upon the Web of Science.
Papers are limited to those published between 2015 to 2019. However, the citations to those papers come from all publications up to the most recent data available. For the 2022 edition of the Best Global Universities, published October 26, 2021, this cutoff was April 29, 2021, with an InCites™ publication of May 30, 2021. It is necessary to use a slightly older window of publication to allow citations to accumulate and provide statistically relevant results.
The subject fields used in the analysis came from the Clarivate subject schemas and did not include arts and humanities journals; therefore, those are excluded from the citation-based indicators. But articles from arts and humanities journals were included in the count of scholarly papers in the publications indicator. Arts and humanities journals accumulate few citations and citation analysis is less robust; as such, the deliberate exclusion of arts and humanities improves the robustness of the results.
There was no missing data in the bibliometric or reputation indicators.
University Rankings by Region
After the overall top 1,750 universities ranking was calculated, U.S. News then produced additional rankings. The U.S. News Best Global Universities rankings by region show the top institutions in five regions with
a large number of globally ranked schools. Those regions are Africa, Asia, Australia/New Zealand, Europe and Latin America. To determine which countries are in which region, we used the U.N. definition of geographical regions.
Universities are ranked in their region based solely on their position in the overall Best Global Universities ranking.
For example, the top-ranking European institution, United Kingdom’s University of Oxford, comes in at No. 5 globally. This overall position also makes the school No. 1 in Europe’s regional ranking. The second highest-ranked university in Europe is the U.K.’s University of Cambridge, which is ranked No. 8 globally, making it No. 2 in Europe.
University Rankings by Country
The U.S. News Best Global Universities rankings by country show the top institutions in 46 countries, all of which have five or more schools in the overall ranking. Universities are ranked in their country based on their position in the overall Best Global Universities ranking.
For example, the Canadian institution that fares the best in the worldwide rankings is the University of Toronto, at No. 16. This overall position also makes the school No. 1 in the Best Global Universities in Canada ranking. The second highest-ranked university in Canada in the overall ranking is the University of British Columbia, at No. 35, making it No. 2 in Canada, and next is McGill University, which is No. 51 overall and No. 3 in Canada.
[wp-rss-aggregator]
Source: https://www.usnews.com/