This All Important Article Aims At Assessing WAEC’s Role in WASSCE Exam Malpractices And The Systemic Vulnerabilities, Enforcement Challenges, and the Technological Impact on Exam Integrity Ahead of the 2025 WASSCE.

Already, criminals have started advertising fees for students, schools and parents who want to access their leaked questions and answers services. Are we looking at another examination where leakage will take place and cheating will go undetected?

Disecting WAEC’s Role in WASSCE Exam Malpractices Ahead of 2025 WASSCE

Anytime there is examination leakage or malpractice, WAEC never blames itself as being part of the problem. Again, you hardly hear of WAEC dealing with its own staff for contributing to the leakage. Are the officers of WAEC saints? This is a big no.

The potential contributions of the West African Examination Council (WAEC) to examination malpractices during the (WASSCE) in 2025 can be understood by an analysis of systemic vulnerabilities that have exisited till now. These vulnerabilities often arise from inadequate infrastructure and supervision during exams, which collectively create a fertile land for the professional fault. As Agwu et al noted. (2022), the proliferation of “miracle examination centers” represents a critical failure in the framework of the examination . These centers, often operating just outside the limits of legality, provide students with a support network that compromises the integrity of the examination process. The existence of these sites underlines how the inability of WAEC to monitor and effectively supervise exam logistics leads to a ripe environment for exploitation.

In addition, problems concerning infrastructure inadequacy extend beyond physical examination centers. Many schools and exam centers do not have the basic resources necessary to maintain a secure test environment, which includes appropriate surveillance systems and trained personnel to detect cheating methods. The dependence on obsolete technology in certain areas further complicates the situation, allowing examination practices to go unnoticed and undisputed. The result is a negligence cycle that WAEC must address to protect the value of the WASSCE.

In addition to infrastructure problems, the lack of effective quality assurance mechanisms is an important contributor to examination malpractices. Babalola (2023) stresses that current WAEC executives for quality insurance may not adequately approach the evolutionary techniques used by candidates to engage in dishonest practices. Without a proactive approach to improving its surveillance systems and adapting to new threats, WAEC inadvertently facilitates an atmosphere where students feel right to seek unjustified advantages. The absence of rigorous internal controls and independent audits exacerbates this vulnerability, because it allows schools and administrators to operate without fear of repercussions, not complying with equity standards in the examination process.

Macauley (2023) says that systemic problems aggravated by inadequate surveillance can affect the performance of candidates. This phenomenon leads to normalization of fraud on examination; Students are increasingly believing that the success at the WAEC is a more viable through cheating than hard work and dedication. Consequently, the pressure to succeed pushes students to collaborate on dishonest practices, promoting an environment where moral considerations concerning the integrity of WAEC decrease. Today people are not excited when excellent results are flashed on the internet because of the increased examination malpractices. This systemic disintegration problems faced by WAEC has deep implications, because educational ethics go from one of the survival strategies to take exams.

In addition, the role of technological progress cannot be neglected when analyzing these systemic vulnerabilities. As technological tools become more sophisticated, students can use new cheating methods, ranging from digital information sharing to the use of devices capable of recording and transmitting information. Although WAEC has taken measures to implement more technologically motivated examination formats, such as computer tests in certain regions, the challenge remains to keep up with the rapid evolution of these technologies. WAEC’s inability to innovate in response to these changes has a direct impact on the organization’s ability to effectively apply integrity measures.

The contributions of the WAEC to the examination malpractice to through systemic vulnerabilities are multifaceted. The combination of inadequate infrastructure, mediocre quality insurance systems and the challenges posed by progression technology creates an environment where the integrity of exams is constantly threatened. To fight against these vulnerabilities, WAEC must adopt a avant-garde approach which favours the culture of a solid frame of supervision of exams, which emphasizes the integration of technology and ethical standards in education., Application problems also contribute significantly to the compromise of the integrity of the exams in the Wassce assessments.

The application of the exam policies was historically weak, which opened the avenues for the collusion between students and invigers. This collusion is indicative of a systemic failure within the examination framework that allows negligence to thrive. Ogboru (2025) highlights the critical role that academic consultants play in the prevention of this misconduct. When the consultants neglect their responsibilities or, worse still, they engage in non-ethical practices, they inadvertently encourage a culture of dishonesty. The absence of rigorous responsibility measures both for students and for invigios can create an environment in which cheating are not only normalized but also expected.

The consequences of these gaps of application can be terrible. Eze and Ebouh (2025) argue that a badly managed examination environment does not simply facilitate negligence; It serves to legitimize it in the eyes of the students. When candidates perceive that the probability of detecting is low, their propensity to engage in dishonest behaviour increases. This normalization of negligence promotes a toxic cycle that is incredibly demanding to break. In essence, the inadequate application efforts erod the fundamental principles of the integrity of the exam, leading to a significant amortization of the value of academic qualifications.

In addition, the implications of the weak application are further echoed in the intuitions of Taiwo and Omomy (2025), which discuss the crucial necessity of strategic reforms in the supervision of the exam. Their results suggest that the integrity of the WAEC can only be supported through a global approach that deals with systemic vulnerabilities within the examination process. These reforms should include not only the introduction of rigorous policies, but also the establishment of a solid monitoring framework capable of tracing the adhesion and compliance with the exam standards.

Given the evolution educational assessments, including progress in technology, traditional methods of invigilation and supervision may no longer be sufficient. The dependence on human invigios presents intrinsic weaknesses, especially in contexts in which their roles are compromised. The distribution of technology, such as biometric identification systems and real -time monitoring platforms, could significantly discourage reduced practices by reducing collusion opportunities. Embrace technological innovation in the examination contexts, guaranteeing its fair application, could strengthen application efforts and improve the general integrity of the exams.

However, it is essential to recognize that technology alone cannot solve the problem of the negligence of the exams. A concerted effort is needed to deal with the underlying cultural and systemic issues that facilitate these non -ethical behaviors. This includes the revaluation of the training provided to invigirate and academic consultants, ensuring that they are equipped not only to enforce the policies, but also to embody the ethical standards they expected from them. Only through these holistic reforms can they hope to mitigate the application problems that currently jeopardize the integrity of the Wassce exam in 2025 and beyond., As technology continues to evolve, its growing influence on the integrity of the exam deserves consideration with respect to WAEC’s possible contributions to WAEC’s bad practices.

WAEC’s Role in WASSCE Exam Malpractices may also be the result of advance in technology and their failure to catch up with modern trands. While technological advances have undoubtedly allowed more efficient exam processes, these changes also introduce significant risks for the examination of integrity. For example, the proliferation of smartphones and other digital devices has made access to large resources, including unauthorized materials, simpler than ever. As Schmidt (2023) pointed out, the ease of dissemination of trap materials online raises a considerable threat to WAEC’s integrity. This situation generates a paradox by which technology, aimed at rationalizing and ensuring exam processes, is exploited simultaneously to facilitate bad practices.

Again, the incorporation of digital media in exams should be managed meticulously to avoid exacerbating existing systemic vulnerabilities. Educational environments are increasingly supported by adaptive technologies to adapt learning experiences for students. However, as Baah (2021) stands out, these advances can inadvertently create new opportunities for misconduct if appropriate safeguards are not instituted. For example, if WAEC implemented online evaluations without integral monitoring systems, the potential for deception could increase. Students can use various tools to collaborate illegally or access the prohibited content during the exam process, thus undermining the central purpose of evaluating the knowledge and competence of students.

It is important to add that, Chinaka and Osisanya (2020) emphasize the critical need for equitable access to technology as a means to combat disparities in exam preparation. The greater dependence on technology in the Wassce could inadvertently highlight the existing socioeconomic divisions, where students of disadvantaged origins can lack access to the same resources and devices that others have. This inequality not only affects preparation, but also exposes the examination of vulnerabilities, since those with greater access to technology could organize more practices. Therefore, without adequate supervision and inclusive implementation strategies, improved technology could ultimately contribute to academic dishonesty instead of mitigating it.

WAEC cannot assume not ot be part of the problem nor run away from its role in WASSCE Exam Malpractices in the past. Therefore, the role of WAEC to guarantee the integrity of the exams must adapt to these evolving technological landscapes. As trap methods continue to evolve, the strategies used to enforce the integrity of the exam. This includes the development of sophisticated security measures, such as biometric verification, artificial intelligence monitoring systems and advanced analytical tools to detect anomalies in examination patterns. However, each of these solutions comes with its own set of challenges and possible difficulties. The technology dependence should be balanced with a critical understanding of how it can be manipulated. Otherwise, it could allow a cycle of bad practices that become increasingly difficult to fight as technology continues to progress.

Ultimately, WAEC has a significant responsibility in the configuration of a future where technology improves instead of decreasing the integrity of the Wassce. The dynamic interaction between technological innovation and the potential for academic misconduct requires a proactive approach to the development of policies that not only aim to prevent bad practices, but also address inherent vulnerability within the exam system. Through a reflexive implementation and a constant reevaluation of these policies, WAEC can try to create a more fair and reliable examination in the middle of a constantly changing technology.

READ: Does GES allow study leave with pay for Master’s and PhD?

WAEC’s Role in WASSCE Exam Malpractices has existed for long and them must be part of the solutions as well. However the solution starts with WAEC admiting that it places an active or inactive, direct or indirect roles in the malpractices.

CITATIONS
Macauley, D. J. (2023). Educators’ perceptions about the performance of 2021 WASSCE examination candidates in Liberia. Northcentral University. https://search.proquest.com/openview/4ee0682aaeba3f6e0c62a9b94be1bebc/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Omomia Taiwo, A., & Omomia, O. Austin (2025). Impact of entrepreneurial skills acquisition on women empowerment in Maiduguri metropolis, Borno state, Nigeria: implications for programme planning. KIU Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 209-234. https://kijhus.kiu.ac.ug/assets/articles/1748020009_quality-assurance-practices-in-education-for-socio-economic-development-in-nigeria.pdf

Agwu, P., Orjiakor, C. T., Odii, A., Onalu, C., Nzeadibe, C., Roy, P., … & Okoye, U. (2022). Corruption during final external examinations in private secondary schools in Nigeria: Qualitative insights into operations and solutions to ‘Miracle Examination Centres’. https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/publications/corruption-during-final-external-examinations-in-private-secondar

OGBORU, J. O. (2025). ROLES OF ACADEMIC ADVISERS IN PREVENTING EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE AMONG HOME ECONOMICS STUDENTS: A CASE STUDY OF FEDERAL UNIVERSITIES IN SOUTH WEST, NIGERIA. Journal of Science, Vocational and Technical Education, 12(1), 23-33. https://josvte.org.ng/index.php/josvte/article/view/39

Eze, I. R., & Ebouh, C. (2025). ASSESSEMENT OF DESIRABLE TEST ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS USED FOR BASIC EDUCATION CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION (BECE) IN ENUGU EDUCATION ZONE. Research Journal of Education and Development, 13(2), 23-40. https://hollexpub.org/J/index.php/26/article/view/1180

Babalola, C. Quality Assurance in Higher Institutions: A Case Study of Chrisland University, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Lagos/Paris/Washington 2023, 263. https://www.chea.org/sites/default/files/other-content/Quality-Assurance-in-Higher-Education-Across-the-World-Book.pdf#page=265

Chinaka, A. F., & Osisanya, A. (2020). Effect of cooperative learning and peer tutoring on performance in biology among students with hearing impairment in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Education, 18(1). https://123pdf.org/document/zkw8k5ge-effect-cooperative-learning-tutoring-performance-students-impairment-nigeria.html

Schmidt, T. (2023). International and Development Economics. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tim-Schmidt-22/publication/385909974_The_Free_Quality_School_Education_Program_in_Sierra_Leone_Achievements_and_Remaining_Challenges/links/673b7fd6b94c451c1160647e/The-Free-Quality-School-Education-Program-in-Sierra-Leone-Achievements-and-Remaining-Challenges.pdf

Baah, J. (2021). Government and private schools in the inner city of Accra: exploring choice, experiences, and aspirations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex). https://sussex.figshare.com/articles/thesis/Government_and_private_schools_in_the_inner_city_of_Accra_exploring_choice_experiences_and_aspirations/23483816

AJAGBE, I. M. (2023). PRESCRIBED TEXTS AND STUDENT FACTORS AS DETERMINANTS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES IN PROSE LITERATURE-IN-ENGLISH AMONG PUBLIC SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN IBADAN, NIGERIA (Doctoral dissertation). http://140.105.46.132:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1993